Abstract
AbstractThe quality of curriculum resources and teaching practices can constrain or promote students’ opportunities for mathematics learning, in particular, students with diverse language proficiency. The video study investigates 18 classes that all used the same curriculum resources aimed at developing 367 seventh graders’ conceptual understanding of percentages to identify the interaction of quality dimensions, the enactment of given curriculum resources, and students’ mathematical achievement (when controlling for mathematical preknowledge and language proficiency). Multilevel regression analysis revealed that three quality dimensions that can easily be supported by the curriculum resources (Mathematical Richness, Cognitive Demand, and Connecting Registers) were on a high level, and their variance had no additional interaction with students’ achievement. In contrast, the 4 quality dimensions that were enacted in the teacher-student interaction with more variance (Agency, Equitable Access, Discursive Demand, and, in particular, Use of Student Contributions) had a significant additional impact on student achievement. These findings reveal important insights into the implementability of equitable instructional approaches.
Funder
national ministry of education and research
IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference42 articles.
1. Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2015). A framework for describing mathematics discourse in instruction and interpreting differences in teaching. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1089677
2. Barwell, R., Clarkson, P., Halai, A., Kazima, M., Moschkovich, J., Planas, N., & Villavicencio, M. (Eds.). (2016). Mathematics education and language diversity: The 21st ICMI Study. Springer.
3. Brophy, J. (2000). Educational Practices Series: Vol. 1. Teaching. International Academy of Education (IAE).
4. Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M., Kramer, S., Hiebert, J., & Bakker, A. (2020). Maximizing the quality of learning opportunities for every student. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0005
5. Callahan, R. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal Summer, 42(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002305
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献