Abstract
AbstractInstructional quality dimensions of cognitive demands and instructional support have been shown to have an impact on students’ learning gains. Existing operationalizations of these dimensions have mostly used comprehensive ratings that combine various subdimensions of task quality and interaction quality. The current study disentangles interaction quality in a video data corpus study (of 49 middle school classrooms sharing the same tasks) to identify those quality features that predict students’ learning gains in conceptual understanding. The regression analysis reveals that quality features of students’ individual engagement do not predict individual student learning, whereas teachers’ support of learning content-relevant vocabulary predicts the small groups’ learning. For at-risk students, the collective time spent on conceptual practices (i.e. explaining meanings of concepts) on students’ learning is significantly predictive. The observation that different operationalizations (for similar aspects of interaction quality) lead to different impacts on the learning gains contributes to ongoing research efforts to refine and increase insight into aspects of interaction quality.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference52 articles.
1. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
2. Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching: Research agenda for mathematics education (pp. 27–46). NCTM/Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., Sherman, M., & Boston, M. (2021). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09445-0
4. Brophy, J. (2000). Teaching (Educational Practices Series Vol. 1). Int. Academy of education.
5. Brühwiler, C., & Blatchford, P. (2011). Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.004
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献