1. Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.
2. Chang, H.-Y., Quintana, C. & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 94, 73-94.
3. Chang, H.-Y., Quintana, C. & Krajcik, J. S. (2014). Using drawing technology to assess students' visualizations of chemical reaction processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 355-369.
4. Cheng, M. & Gilbert, J. K. (2009). Towards a better utilization of diagrams in research into the use of representative levels in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (Vol. 4, pp. 55–73). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
5. diSessa, A. A. (2002). Students’ criteria for representational adequacy. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105–129). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.