Fostering Functional Occupation and Mobility in People with Intellectual Disability and Visual Impairment Through Technology-Aided Support

Author:

Lancioni Giulio E.,Singh Nirbhay N.,O’Reilly Mark F.,Sigafoos Jeff,Alberti Gloria,Chiariello Valeria,Abbatantuono Chiara,Taurisano Paolo,Desideri Lorenzo

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The study assessed a smartphone-based technology system, which was designed to support functional occupation and mobility in people with severe to profound intellectual disability and visual impairment. Methods The technology system provided (a) verbal orientation cues to guide the participants to a desk with two containers (and two groups of 10 objects that were to be transported to two different destinations), (b) verbal instructions to take the objects (one at a time), (c) verbal orientation cues to reach the destinations where the objects taken had to be transported, (d) instructions to put away the objects at the destinations, and (e) praise and brief periods of preferred stimulation. Seven participants were involved in the study, which was carried out according to a nonconcurrent multiple baseline across participants design. Results During the baseline (when the technology system was not available), the participants produced few or no correct responses (i.e., failed to collect, transport, and deposit objects at the right destinations). During the intervention phase (i.e., with the support of the technology system), their mean frequency of correct responses per session was between close to 19 and close to 20 (out of a maximum possible of 20) and their mean session duration varied between about 16 and 29 min. Conclusions The data suggest that the technology system used in this study may be a viable resource to support activity and mobility in people with intellectual and visual disabilities.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference52 articles.

1. Balboni, G., Belacchi, C., Bonichini, S., & Coscarelli, A. (2016). Vineland II. Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Standardizzazione Italiana, OS.

2. Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single-case experimental designs (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

3. Bertelli, M. O., Munir, K., Harris, J., & Salvador-Carulla, L. (2016). Intellectual developmental disorders: Reflections on the international consensus document for redefining mental retardation-intellectual disability in ICD-11. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 10(1), 36–58.

4. Boot, F. H., Owuor, J., Dinsmore, J., & MacLachlan, M. (2018). Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(10), 900–921.

5. Borg, J. (2019). Commentary on selection of assistive technology in a context with limited resources. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(8), 753–754.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3