Author:
Lancioni Giulio E.,Singh Nirbhay N.,O’Reilly Mark F.,Sigafoos Jeff,Alberti Gloria,Chiariello Valeria,Abbatantuono Chiara,Taurisano Paolo,Desideri Lorenzo
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The study assessed a smartphone-based technology system, which was designed to support functional occupation and mobility in people with severe to profound intellectual disability and visual impairment.
Methods
The technology system provided (a) verbal orientation cues to guide the participants to a desk with two containers (and two groups of 10 objects that were to be transported to two different destinations), (b) verbal instructions to take the objects (one at a time), (c) verbal orientation cues to reach the destinations where the objects taken had to be transported, (d) instructions to put away the objects at the destinations, and (e) praise and brief periods of preferred stimulation. Seven participants were involved in the study, which was carried out according to a nonconcurrent multiple baseline across participants design.
Results
During the baseline (when the technology system was not available), the participants produced few or no correct responses (i.e., failed to collect, transport, and deposit objects at the right destinations). During the intervention phase (i.e., with the support of the technology system), their mean frequency of correct responses per session was between close to 19 and close to 20 (out of a maximum possible of 20) and their mean session duration varied between about 16 and 29 min.
Conclusions
The data suggest that the technology system used in this study may be a viable resource to support activity and mobility in people with intellectual and visual disabilities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference52 articles.
1. Balboni, G., Belacchi, C., Bonichini, S., & Coscarelli, A. (2016). Vineland II. Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Standardizzazione Italiana, OS.
2. Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single-case experimental designs (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bertelli, M. O., Munir, K., Harris, J., & Salvador-Carulla, L. (2016). Intellectual developmental disorders: Reflections on the international consensus document for redefining mental retardation-intellectual disability in ICD-11. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 10(1), 36–58.
4. Boot, F. H., Owuor, J., Dinsmore, J., & MacLachlan, M. (2018). Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(10), 900–921.
5. Borg, J. (2019). Commentary on selection of assistive technology in a context with limited resources. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(8), 753–754.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献