Intakes of major food groups in China and UK: results from 100,000 adults in the China Kadoorie biobank and UK biobank

Author:

Papier KerenORCID,Kakkoura Maria G.ORCID,Guo Yu,Knuppel AnikaORCID,Pei Pei,Tong Tammy Y. N.ORCID,Yu Canqing,Perez-Cornago AuroraORCID,Chang Wing Ching,Chen Junshi,Lv Jun,Li Liming,Chen Zhengming,Du HuaidongORCID,Key Timothy J.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Different populations may exhibit differences in dietary intakes, which may result in heterogeneities in diet–disease associations. We compared intakes of major food groups overall, by sex, and by socio-economic status (SES) (defined as both education and income), between participants in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) and the UK Biobank (UKB). Methods Data were from ~ 25,000 CKB participants who completed a validated interviewer-administered computer-based questionnaire (2013–2014) and ~ 74,000 UKB participants who completed ≥ 3 web-based 24-h dietary assessments (2009–2012). Intakes of 12 major food groups and five beverages were harmonized and compared between the cohorts overall, by sex and by SES. Multivariable-adjusted linear regression examined the associations between dietary intakes and body mass index (BMI) in each cohort. Results CKB participants reported consuming more rice, eggs, vegetables, soya products, and less wheat, other staple foods (other than rice and wheat), fish, poultry, all dairy products, fruit, and beverages compared to UKB participants. Red meat intake was similar in both cohorts. Having a higher SES was generally associated with a higher consumption of foods and beverages in CKB, whereas in UKB dietary intakes differed more by education and income, with a positive association observed for meat and income in both UKB and CKB but an inverse association observed for education in UKB. Associations of dietary intakes with BMI varied between the two cohorts. Conclusion The large differences in dietary intakes and their associations with SES and BMI could provide insight into the interpretation of potentially different diet–disease associations between CKB and UKB.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Cancer Research UK

UK Medical Research Council

World Cancer Research Fund

National Key Research and Development Program of China

National Natural Science Foundation of China

British Heart Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference49 articles.

1. Papier K, Knuppel A, Syam N, Jebb SA (2021) Key TJ (2021) Meat consumption and risk of ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 10(1080/10408398):1949575

2. Du H, Li L, Bennett D, Yang L, Guo Y, Key TJ, Bian Z, Chen Y, Walters RG, Millwood IY, Chen J, Wang J, Zhou X, Fang L, Li Y, Li X, Collins R, Peto R, Chen Z (2017) Fresh fruit consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank. Int J Epidemiol 46(5):1444–1455. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx042

3. Bechthold A, Boeing H, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Knüppel S, Iqbal K, De Henauw S, Michels N, Devleesschauwer B, Schlesinger S, Schwingshackl L (2019) Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59(7):1071–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1392288

4. Bates B, Lennox A, Prentice A, Bates C, Page P, Nicholson S, Swan G (2014) National diet and nutrition survey: results from years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the rolling programme (2008/2009–2011/2012): a survey carried out on behalf of public health England and the food standards agency. Public Health England

5. He Y, Li Y, Yang X, Hemler EC, Fang Y, Zhao L, Zhang J, Yang Z, Wang Z, He L, Sun J, Wang DD, Wang J, Piao J, Liang X, Ding G, Hu FB (2019) The dietary transition and its association with cardiometabolic mortality among Chinese adults, 1982–2012: a cross-sectional population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7(7):540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30152-4

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3