1. Artzt, A.F., and Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137–175.
2. Artzt, A.F., and Armour-Thomas, E. ( 1996, April). Evaluation of instructional practice in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
3. Artzt, A.F., and Armour-Thomas, E. ( 1993. April). Mathematics teaching as problem solving: A framework for studying the relationship between instructional practice and teachers’ cognitive and metacognitive thoughts and behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Atlanta.
4. Ball, D.L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation. In 1..E..Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching Teachers’ subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (pp. 1–48) (Vol. 2 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Borko, H. and Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26 (4), 473–498.