An Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research

Author:

Xafis VickiORCID,Schaefer G. OwenORCID,Labude Markus K.ORCID,Brassington IainORCID,Ballantyne AngelaORCID,Lim Hannah Yeefen,Lipworth WendyORCID,Lysaght TamraORCID,Stewart CameronORCID,Sun Shirley,Laurie Graeme T.ORCID,Tai E ShyongORCID

Abstract

Abstract Ethical decision-making frameworks assist in identifying the issues at stake in a particular setting and thinking through, in a methodical manner, the ethical issues that require consideration as well as the values that need to be considered and promoted. Decisions made about the use, sharing, and re-use of big data are complex and laden with values. This paper sets out an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research developed by a working group convened by the Science, Health and Policy-relevant Ethics in Singapore (SHAPES) Initiative. It presents the aim and rationale for this framework supported by the underlying ethical concerns that relate to all health and research contexts. It also describes a set of substantive and procedural values that can be weighed up in addressing these concerns, and a step-by-step process for identifying, considering, and resolving the ethical issues arising from big data uses in health and research. This Framework is subsequently applied in the papers published in this Special Issue. These papers each address one of six domains where big data is currently employed: openness in big data and data repositories, precision medicine and big data, real-world data to generate evidence about healthcare interventions, AI-assisted decision-making in healthcare, public-private partnerships in healthcare and research, and cross-sectoral big data.

Funder

National Medical Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Health (social science)

Reference53 articles.

1. Andrejevic, Mark Bardeen. 2014. The big data divide. International Journal of Communication 8 (1): 1673–1689.

2. Austin, Bobbie Ann, and Ami D. Gadhia. 2017. New therapeutic uses for existing drugs. In Rare diseases epidemiology: update and overview, eds. Manuel Posada de la Paz, Domenica Taruscio, and Stephen C. Groft, 233–247. Cham: Springer.

3. Ballantyne, Angela, and Cameron Stewart. 2019. Big Data and Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare and Research: The application of an ethics framework for big data in health and research Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-019-00100-7 .

4. Baro, Emilie, Samuel Degoul, Régis Beuscart, and Emmanuel Chazard. 2015. Toward a literature-driven definition of big data in healthcare. BioMed Research International: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/639021 .

5. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 80 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3