Abstract
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are established to specifically harness the potential of Big Data in healthcare and can include partners working across the data chain—producing health data, analysing data, using research results or creating value from data. This domain paper will illustrate the challenges that arise when partners from the public and private sector collaborate to share, analyse and use biomedical Big Data. We discuss three specific challenges for PPPs: working within the social licence, public antipathy to the commercialisation of public sector health data, and questions of ownership, both of the data and any resulting intellectual property or products. As a specific example we consider the case of the UK National Health Service (NHS) providing patient data to Google’s DeepMind AI program to develop a diagnostic app for kidney disease. This article is an application of the framework presented in this issue of ABR (Xafis et al. 2019). Please refer to that article for more information on how this framework is to be used, including a full explanation of the key values involved and the balancing approach used in the case study at the end. We use four specific values to help analysis these issues: public benefit, stewardship, transparency and engagement. We demonstrate how the Deliberative Framework can support ethical governance of PPPs involving biomedical big data.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Philosophy,Health(social science)
Reference30 articles.
1. Ballantyne, Angela. 2018. Where is the human in the data? A guide to ethical data use. GigaScience 7 (7): 1–3.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy076
.
2. Carter, Pam, Graeme T. Laurie, and Mary Dixon-Woods. 2015. The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (5): 404–409.
https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102374
.
3. Cook-Deegan, Robert, and Christopher Heaney. 2010. Patents in genomics and human genetics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 11 (1): 383–425.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141811
.
4. Delvin, Hannah. 2017. UK needs to act urgently to secure NHS data for British public, report warns. The Guardian, 30 August 2017.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/aug/30/uk-needs-to-act-urgently-to-secure-nhs-data-for-british-public-report-warns
. Accessed 24 July 2019.
5. Dixon-Woods, Mary, and Richard Ashcroft. 2008. Regulation and the social licence for medical research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4): 381–391.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9152-0
.
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献