Promoting Data Sharing: The Moral Obligations of Public Funding Agencies

Author:

Wendelborn ChristianORCID,Anger MichaelORCID,Schickhardt ChristophORCID

Abstract

AbstractSharing research data has great potential to benefit science and society. However, data sharing is still not common practice. Since public research funding agencies have a particular impact on research and researchers, the question arises: Are public funding agencies morally obligated to promote data sharing? We argue from a research ethics perspective that public funding agencies have several pro tanto obligations requiring them to promote data sharing. However, there are also pro tanto obligations that speak against promoting data sharing in general as well as with regard to particular instruments of such promotion. We examine and weigh these obligations and conclude that all things considered funders ought to promote the sharing of data. Even the instrument of mandatory data sharing policies can be justified under certain conditions.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference129 articles.

1. All European Academies (ALLEA) (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Retrieved 25 February 2022 https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/.

2. Alvarez, M. (2016). Reasons for action: Justification, motivation, explanation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 edition). Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/.

3. Anger, M., Wendelborn, C., & Schickhardt, C. (2024). German funders’ data sharing policies—A qualitative interview study. PLoS ONE, 19(2), e0296956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296956

4. Anger, M., Wendelborn, C., Winkler, E. C., & Schickhardt, C. (2022). Neither carrots nor sticks? Challenges surrounding data sharing from the perspective of research funding agencies—A qualitative expert interview study. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0273259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273259

5. Barsdorf, N., & Millum, J. (2017). The social value of health research and the worst off. Bioethics, 31(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12320

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3