Abstract
This paper offers a methodological framework to research data practices in education critically. Data practices are understood in the generic sense of the word here, i.e., as the actions, performances, and the resulting consequences, of introducing data-producing technologies in everyday educational situations. The paper first distinguishes between data infrastructures, datafication and data points as three distinct, yet interrelated, phenomena. In order to investigate their concrete doings and specificities, the paper proposes a topological methodology that allows disentangling the relational nature and interwovenness of data practices. Based on this methodology, the paper proceeds with outlining a methodical toolbox that can be employed in studying data practices. Starting from nascent work on digital education platforms as a worked example, the toolbox allows researchers to investigate data practices as consisting of four unique topological dimensions: the Interface of a data practice, its actual Usage, its concrete Design, and its Ecological embeddedness - IUDE.
Funder
Research Council, KU Leuven
Reference65 articles.
1. Agre, P. E. (1994). Surveillance and capture: Two models of privacy. The Information Society, 10(2), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1994.9960162
2. Alirezabeigi, S., Masschelein, J. & Decuypere, M. (2020). Investigating digital doings through breakdowns: a sociomaterial ethnography of a Bring Your Own Device school. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1727501
3. Topologies of power;Allen;Beyond territory and networks,2016
4. Bratton, B. (2015). The Stack: On software and sovereignty. MIT Press.
5. Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献