Evaluation of a Particle Swarm Algorithm For Biomechanical Optimization

Author:

Schutte Jaco F.1,Koh Byung-Il2,Reinbolt Jeffrey A.1,Haftka Raphael T.1,George Alan D.3,Fregly Benjamin J.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6250

2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6250

3. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6250

4. Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6250

Abstract

Optimization is frequently employed in biomechanics research to solve system identification problems, predict human movement, or estimate muscle or other internal forces that cannot be measured directly. Unfortunately, biomechanical optimization problems often possess multiple local minima, making it difficult to find the best solution. Furthermore, convergence in gradient-based algorithms can be affected by scaling to account for design variables with different length scales or units. In this study we evaluate a recently- developed version of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to address these problems. The algorithm’s global search capabilities were investigated using a suite of difficult analytical test problems, while its scale-independent nature was proven mathematically and verified using a biomechanical test problem. For comparison, all test problems were also solved with three off-the-shelf optimization algorithms—a global genetic algorithm (GA) and multistart gradient-based sequential quadratic programming (SQP) and quasi-Newton (BFGS) algorithms. For the analytical test problems, only the PSO algorithm was successful on the majority of the problems. When compared to previously published results for the same problems, PSO was more robust than a global simulated annealing algorithm but less robust than a different, more complex genetic algorithm. For the biomechanical test problem, only the PSO algorithm was insensitive to design variable scaling, with the GA algorithm being mildly sensitive and the SQP and BFGS algorithms being highly sensitive. The proposed PSO algorithm provides a new off-the-shelf global optimization option for difficult biomechanical problems, especially those utilizing design variables with different length scales or units.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rotation error separation of a UTF300 high-speed and precision motorized spindle;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering;2024-09-10

2. Predicting Forces in the Components of the Human Upper Limb through Multibody Dynamics and Optimization Techniques;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2024-07-01

3. Upper Extremity Muscle Activation Pattern Prediction Through Synergy Extrapolation and Electromyography-Driven Modeling;Journal of Biomechanical Engineering;2023-11-15

4. X-Intersected Silicon Modulator of Well-Rounded Performance;Micromachines;2023-07-17

5. Jumping Particle Swarm Optimization;Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology;2021-09-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3