Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Via Giuseppe Saragat, 1, Ferrara 44122, Italy e-mail:
2. ALSTOM (Switzerland) Ltd, Brown Boveri Strasse 7, Baden 5401, Switzerland e-mail:
Abstract
In this paper, a prognostic methodology is applied to gas turbine field data to assess its capability as a predictive tool for degradation effects. On the basis of the recordings of past behavior, the methodology provides a prediction of future performance, i.e., the probability that degradation effects are at an acceptable level in future operations. The analyses carried out in this paper consider two different parameters (power output and compressor efficiency) of three different Alstom gas turbine power plants (gas turbine type GT13E2, GT24, and GT26). To apply the prognostic methodology, site specific degradation threshold values were defined, to identify the time periods with acceptable degradation (i.e., higher-than-threshold operation) and the time periods where maintenance activities are recommended (i.e., lower-than-threshold operation). This paper compares the actual distribution of the time points until the degradation limit is reached (discrete by nature) to the continuously varying distribution of the time points simulated by the probability density functions obtained through the prognostic methodology. Moreover, the reliability of the methodology prediction is assessed for all the available field data of the three gas turbines and for two values of the threshold. For this analysis, the prognostic methodology is applied by considering different numbers of degradation periods for methodology calibration and the accuracy of the next forecasted trends is compared to the real data. Finally, this paper compares the prognostic methodology prediction to a “purely deterministic” prediction chosen to be the average of the past time points of higher-than-threshold operations. The results show that, in almost all cases, the prognostic methodology allows a better prediction than the “purely deterministic” approach for both power and compressor efficiency degradation. Therefore, the prognostic methodology seems to be a robust and reliable tool to predict gas turbine power plant “probabilistic” degradation.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference45 articles.
1. Property Risk Assessment for Power Plants: Methodology, Validation and Application;Energy,2011
2. Adaptive Simulation of Gas Turbine Performance;ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,1990
3. Bettocchi, R., and Spina, P. R., 1999, “Diagnosis of Gas Turbine Operating Conditions by Means of the Inverse Cycle Calculation,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-185.
4. Pinelli, M., and Venturini, M., 2002, “Application of Methodologies to Evaluate the Health State of Gas Turbines in a Cogenerative Combined Cycle Power Plant,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30248.10.1115/GT2002-30248
5. Doel, D. L., 2003, “Development of Baselines, Influence Coefficients and Statistical Inputs for Gas Path Analysis,” Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis (von Karman Institute Lecture Series No. 2003-01), von Karman Institute, Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献