Affiliation:
1. Stanford University School of Education
Abstract
The standards-based reform movement has led to increased emphasis on tests, coupled with rewards and sanctions, as the basis for “accountability” systems. These strategies have often had unintended consequences that undermine access to education for low-achieving students rather than enhancing it. This article argues that testing is information for an accountability system; it is not the system itself. More successful outcomes have been secured in states and districts, described here, that have focused on broader notions of accountability, including investments in teacher knowledge and skill, organization of schools to support teacher and student learning, and systems of assessment that drive curriculum reform and teaching improvements.
Reference69 articles.
1. Unintended Effects of Educational Reform in New York
2. Baenen N. (1988, April). A perspective after five years: Has grade retention passed or failed? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
3. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21” century. Washington, DC: Task Force on Education of Young Addolescents.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献