A multicentre study comparing two methods for serum free light chain analysis

Author:

Lock RJ1,Saleem R2,Roberts EG1,Wallage MJ1,Pesce TJ3,Rowbottom A2,Cooper SJ4,McEvoy ED4,Taylor JL4,Basu S4

Affiliation:

1. Immunology and Immunogenetics, Pathology Sciences, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB

2. Lancashire & Lakeland Regional Immunology Service, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston PR2 9HT

3. Blood Science Specials Laboratory, Northampton General Hospital, Cliftonville, Northampton, Northamptonshire NN1 5BD

4. Immunology and Haematology Departments, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Hospitals Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK

Abstract

Background Serum free light chain analysis is now well established in the investigation of monoclonal gammopathies. In the UK there has, until recently, been a single supplier of kits for such analysis. Recently, a second method using monoclonal antisera was introduced. We have compared the performance of these two kits in four routine laboratories. Method Samples submitted for routine analysis (327 samples, 258 [79%] from patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disease) for serum free light chains were tested by both technologies (Freelite, Binding Site and N Latex FLC, Siemens), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Results Qualitative data were available by both methods on 313 samples for serum free kappa chains and 324 samples for lambda free light chains. We found poor correspondence of 81% for kappa and 74% for lambda. Five percent of samples were significantly discordant in these assays. Conclusions These assays perform very differently in clinical practice. They cannot be used interchangeably, especially if monitoring patient responses to therapy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3