Vision for Mechanistic-Empirical Railway Track System and Component Analysis and Design

Author:

Edwards J. Riley1,Quirós-Orozco Ricardo J.2,Bastos Josué César3,Dersch Marcus S.1,Tutumluer Erol4

Affiliation:

1. Rail Transportation and Engineering Center—RailTEC, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL

2. Voestalpine Railway Systems Nortrak, Cheyenne, WY

3. Technicontrol, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL

Abstract

Many analytical methods and other processes have been developed for the evaluation of railway track and its components, but these have largely been used for analysis. Design is often driven by development projects that do not engage research, resulting in designs that may not be optimized in the context of the broader track structure. This paper proposes a mechanistic-empirical (M-E) analysis and design framework that encourages an understanding of mechanical load-response behavior and comparison of loading demands, and the capacity of the track infrastructure component under study. The approach builds on similar advancements in the field of highway pavement research, including the development and use of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). Rail applications present unique economies to a focused M-E design approach, given that loads are concentrated in localized regions and beneath the rails. This paper first reviews prior design and analysis approaches, then presents the essential features of an M-E railway track system and component analysis and design, and, in the end, notes gaps that will require future research before proper implementation of M-E design within rail engineering. The authors also discuss the role of probabilistic design and structural reliability analysis in future design practices. Finally, governing mechanistic failure modes for the track system as well as components and associated life cycle data to achieve full implementation of such an M-E design process are identified and a path forward for implementation is proposed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference62 articles.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating glass fiber reinforced composite sleepers to mitigate elastic fastening system spike fatigue failure: A finite element study;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit;2022-11-03

2. Quantification of longitudinal fastener stiffness and the effect on fastening system loading demand;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit;2022-07-04

3. Analytical Nonlinear Modeling of Rail and Fastener Longitudinal Response;Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board;2022-01-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3