The Daily Me Versus the Daily Others: How Do Recommendation Algorithms Change User Interests? Evidence from a Knowledge-Sharing Platform

Author:

Liu JiaORCID,Cong ZiweiORCID

Abstract

Recommender systems on online platforms are often accused of polarizing user attention and consumption. The authors examine this phenomenon using a quasi-experiment conducted by Zhihu, the largest online knowledge-sharing platform (or Q&A community) in China. Zhihu originally used a content-based filtering algorithm, which recommends content to users on the basis of the topics to which each user has subscribed. After more than a year, Zhihu moved to a social filtering algorithm, which recommends content with which users’ social connections are already engaged. The authors find that this algorithm change increased the creation of social ties by approximately 15% but decreased question subscriptions by 20% and answer contributions by 23%. The authors show that users’ increased social interests mainly involved following popular users, leading to a greater concentration of social interests on the platform. However, users’ topical interests became less concentrated, as popular topics received significantly fewer subscribers than unpopular topics. The authors explain these findings by exploring the underlying mechanism. They show that compared with content-based filtering algorithms, social filtering algorithms are more likely to expose general users to content consumed by their followees, who are more interested in niche topics than general users are.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Reference40 articles.

1. Abdollahpouri Himan, Mansoury Masoud, Burke Robin, Mobasher Bamshad (2019), “The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendation,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.13286.

2. Athey Susan, Mobius Markus M., Pál Jenő (2017), “The Impact of Aggregators on Internet News Consumption,” research paper, Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

3. Atwood Jeff (2008), “Why Can’t I Accept My Own Answer?” The Overflow (December 1), https://stackoverflow.blog/2008/12/01/why-cant-i-accept-my-own-answer/.

4. Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality

5. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3