Testing feasibility and reliability of a set of quality indicators to evaluate the organization of palliative care across Europe: A pilot study in 25 countries

Author:

Woitha Kathrin1,Hasselaar Jeroen1,van Beek Karen2,Ahmed Nisar3,Jaspers Birgit45,Hendriks Jan CM16,Radbruch Lukas4,Vissers Kris1,Engels Yvonne1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

2. Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

3. Academic Unit of Supportive Care, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

4. Palliative Care Centre, Department of Palliative Medicine, Malteser Hospital Bonn/Rhein-Sieg, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

5. Department of Palliative Medicine, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

6. Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: A well-organized palliative care service is a prerequisite for offering good palliative care. Reliable and feasible quality indicators are needed to monitor the quality of their organization. Aim: To test feasibility and reliability of a previously developed set of quality indicators in settings and services that provide palliative care across Europe. Methods: A total of 38 quality indicators, applicable in all types of settings, rated in a RAND Delphi process, and operationalized into 38 yes/no questions, were used. Descriptives statistics, factor and reliability analyses, analysis of variance, and chi-square analyses were used. Design: Cross-sectional online survey. Setting/participants: Questionnaires were sent to representatives of 217 palliative care settings in 25 countries. Included settings were hospices, inpatient dedicated palliative care beds, palliative care outpatient clinics, palliative care units, day care centers for palliative care, palliative care home support teams, inpatient palliative care support teams, care homes, and nursing homes. Results: All invited 25 European Association of Palliative Care countries took part. In total, 107 out of 217 participants responded (57%). The quality indicators were reduced to four coherent sub-scales, being “equipment and continuity of care,” “structured documentation of essential palliative care elements in the medical record,” “training and appraisal of personnel,” and “availability of controlled drugs.” No significant differences in quality criteria between the different types of settings and services were identified. Conclusion: The set of quality indicators appeared to measure four reliable domains that assess the organization of different palliative care settings. It can be used as a starting point for quality improvement activities.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. European Commission E. Major and chronic diseases—cancer, http://ec.europa.eu/health/major_chronic_diseases/diseases/cancer/

2. WHO. Who definition of palliative care, http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/

3. Cottage Industry to Postindustrial Care — The Revolution in Health Care Delivery

4. Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project

5. Validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care: A modified RAND Delphi study in seven European countries (the Europall project)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3