Validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care: A modified RAND Delphi study in seven European countries (the Europall project)

Author:

Woitha Kathrin1,Van Beek Karen2,Ahmed Nisar3,Jaspers Birgit456,Mollard Jean M7,Ahmedzai Sam H3,Hasselaar Jeroen1,Menten Johan2,Vissers Kris1,Engels Yvonne1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

2. Department of Radiation-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

3. Department of Oncology, Academic Unit of Supportive Care, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

4. Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

5. Department of Palliative Medicine, Centre of Palliative Care, Malteser Hospital Bonn/Rhein-Sieg, Bonn, Germany

6. Department of Palliative Medicine, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

7. Réseau de Santé, Paris Sud, Paris, France

Abstract

Background: Validated quality indicators can help health-care professionals to evaluate their medical practices in a comparative manner to deliver optimal clinical care. No international set of quality indicators to measure the organizational aspects of palliative care settings exists. Aim: To develop and validate a set of structure and process indicators for palliative care settings in Europe. Design: A two-round modified RAND Delphi process was conducted to rate clarity and usefulness of a previously developed set of 110 quality indicators. Setting/participants: In total, 20 multi-professional palliative care teams of centers of excellence from seven European countries. Results: In total, 56 quality indicators were rated as useful. These valid quality indicators concerned the following domains: the definition of a palliative care service (2 quality indicators), accessibility to palliative care (16 quality indicators), specific infrastructure to deliver palliative care (8 quality indicators), symptom assessment tools (1 quality indicator), specific personnel in palliative care services (9 quality indicators), documentation methodology of clinical data (14 quality indicators), evaluation of quality and safety procedures (1 quality indicator), reporting of clinical activities (1 quality indicator), and education in palliative care (4 quality indicator). Conclusion: The modified RAND Delphi process resulted in 56 international face-validated quality indicators to measure and compare organizational aspects of palliative care. These quality indicators, aimed to assess and improve the organization of palliative care, will be pilot tested in palliative care settings all over Europe and be used in the EU FP7 funded IMPACT project.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO). 10 facts on aging, April 2012, http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/ageing/en/index.html (accessed 2 October 2012).

2. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer fact sheet, February 2012, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ (accessed 2 October 2012).

3. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3