Large differences in the organization of palliative care in nursing homes in six European countries: findings from the PACE cross-sectional study

Author:

Honinx E.ORCID,Van den Block L.,Piers R.,Onwuteaka-Philipsen B. D.,Payne S.,Szczerbińska K.,Gambassi G.,Kylänen M.,Deliens L.,Smets T.,Gatsolaeva Yuliana,Miranda Rose,Pivodic Lara,Tanghe Marc,van Hout Hein,Pasman Roeline H. R. W.,Oosterveld-Vlug Mariska,Piers Ruth,Wichmann Anne B.,Engels Yvonne,Vernooij-Dassen Myrra,Hockley Jo,Payne Sheila,Leppäaho Suvi,Barańska Ilona,Pautex Sophie,Bassal Catherine,Mammarella Federica,Mercuri Martina,Rossi Paola,Segat Ivan,Stodolska Agata,Adang Eddy,Andreasen Paula,Kuitunen-Kaija Outi,Moore Danni Collingridge,Pac Agnieszka,Kijowska Violetta,ten Koppel Maud,van der Steen Jenny T.,de Paula Emilie Morgan,

Abstract

Abstract Background To be able to provide high-quality palliative care, there need to be a number of organizational structures available in the nursing homes. It is unclear to what extent such structures are actually present in nursing homes in Europe. We aim to examine structural indicators for quality of palliative care in nursing homes in Europe and to evaluate the differences in terms of availability of and access to palliative care, infrastructure for residents and families, multidisciplinary meetings and quality improvement initiatives. Methods A PACE cross-sectional study (2015) of nursing homes in Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland. Nursing homes (N = 322) were selected in each country via proportional stratified random sampling. Nursing home administrators (N = 305) filled in structured questionnaires on nursing home characteristics. Organization of palliative care was measured using 13 of the previously defined IMPACT structural indicators for quality of palliative care covering four domains: availability of and access to palliative care, infrastructure for residents and families, multidisciplinary meetings and quality improvement initiatives. We calculated structural indicator scores for each country and computed differences in indicator scores between the six countries. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compute the p-value of each difference. Results The availability of specialist palliative care teams in nursing homes was limited (6.1–48.7%). In Finland, Poland and Italy, specialist advice was also less often available (35.6–46.9%). Up to 49% of the nursing homes did not provide a dedicated contact person who maintained regular contact with the resident and relatives. The 24/7 availability of opioids for all nursing home residents was low in Poland (37.5%). Conclusions This study found a large heterogeneity between countries in the organization of palliative care in nursing homes, although a common challenge is ensuring sufficient structural access to specialist palliative care services. Policymakers and health and palliative care organizations can use these structural indicators to identify areas for improvement in the organization of palliative care.

Funder

Seventh Framework Programme

Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3