Affiliation:
1. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
Abstract
A recent survey, even one limited to human studies, found considerable “publication scatter” in that more than 250 different professional journals publish articles on obesity. Over the years, and particularly since the 1970s and 1980s when the so-called obesity epidemic began, there has been an explosion of clinical interest in a field that encompasses general medicine, pediatrics, surgery, psychiatry, and almost every subspecialty. And rightly so, since even by 2008, there were an estimated 1.46 billion adults worldwide who were overweight, and of these, 502 million were in the obese category, all of which translate into major public health consequences. Despite many highly publicized studies, why do we not have a greater understanding about obesity than we do? It is certainly not from a lack of trying. This article presents an overview of the limitations and challenges, that is, complexities, due to discrepant frameworks and diverse conceptualizations of obesity; potential flaws inherent in its clinical studies; and particularly, impediments due to difficulties in the measurement of body composition (and particularly adipose accumulation), food intake, and physical activity, as well as to notoriously inaccurate self-reporting by subjects. As a result, clinicians remain limited in issuing recommendations to their patients.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献