Practitioner Appraisals of Their Desired and Current Use of the 2014 Division for Early Childhood Recommended Practices

Author:

Bruder Mary Beth1ORCID,Dunst Carl2,Maude Susan P.3,Schnurr Melissa4,Van Polen Angela4,Frolek Clark Gloria5,Winslow Amanda6,Gethmann Dee4

Affiliation:

1. University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA

2. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute, Asheville, NC, USA

3. Maude Consulting, Jasper, GA, USA

4. Iowa Department of Education, Des Moines, USA

5. The Early Childhood Personnel Center, Adel, IA, USA

6. Iowa Department of Management, Des Moines, IA, USA

Abstract

A survey of 955 early childhood practitioners in one Midwestern state was conducted to assess judgments of their desired use versus their current use or implementation of 10 sets of recommended practices from the Division for Early Childhood of the Council of Exceptional Children. Practitioners from early intervention, preschool, preschool special education, Early Head Start, Head Start, and other early childhood programs participated in the study. Results indicated large effect size differences in practitioners’ judgments of their desired versus current use of the practices, differences in terms in which practices were considered most valued and most frequently used by the practitioners, and a continued gap in the use of practices compared with results reported in similar studies conducted 15 and 22 years ago, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of the need to adopt and use effective professional development practices to ensure practitioner use of valued practices and the need to develop a comprehensive system of personnel development to provide an infrastructure to support practitioners’ knowledge and skills of recommended practices.

Funder

US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3