When Parties Meet Voters

Author:

Calvo Ernesto1,Murillo Maria Victoria2

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

2. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

This article provides a new comparative methodology for the study of party–voter linkages from the perspective of voters, where the critical question that distinguishes clientelistic from programmatic parties is access to publicly provided benefits. In the former case, partisan networks mediate access to goods. In the latter, beneficiaries are defined by policy and access is independent from partisan distribution networks. We show that these different access mechanisms shape voters’ distributive expectations and the nature of their linkages to political parties by developing a unique methodology to measure party networks. We test it using original survey data from Argentina and Chile and show variation both across and within countries on party–voter linkages based on differential access to benefits and parties’ organizational capacity.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 210 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Appendix;Communities, Mines, and Distributive Politics;2024-09-12

2. Conclusion;Communities, Mines, and Distributive Politics;2024-09-12

3. One Firm, Two Distributive Outcomes;Communities, Mines, and Distributive Politics;2024-09-12

4. Defending against Predation above and below Ground;Communities, Mines, and Distributive Politics;2024-09-12

5. Exacerbating Fragmentation and Maintaining Cohesion;Communities, Mines, and Distributive Politics;2024-09-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3