Peer Nominations as a Psychometric Instrument: Many Questions Asked But Few Answered

Abstract

Peer nomination forms (PNFs) are growing in popularity as a screening technique for giftedness. This technique has been judged very favorably by experts in the field. Unfortunately, the research on which these judgments are based is fraught with important methodological weaknesses. A critical analysis of the 13 validation studies of PNFs is presented to justify this assertion. Since PNF's offer advantages that make them a potentially worthy technique, a 4-step blueprint for research on their psychometric qualities is also described: 1) developing a taxonomy of abilities or talents to be assessed by peers, 2) drafting experimental PNFs, 3) evaluating their reliabilities, especially interjudge agreement, 4) conducting rigorous validity studies.