The Effects of Text-Based and Graphics-Based Software Tools on Planning and Organizing of Stories

Author:

Bahr Christine M.1,Nelson Nickola W.2,Meter Adelia M. Van3

Affiliation:

1. Christine M. Bahr, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Special Education and director of the Enabling Technology Center at Western Michigan University. Address: Christine M. Bahr, Department of Special Education, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008.

2. Nickola W. Nelson, PhD, CCC-S, is a professor in the Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology at Western Michigan University. The authors are engaged in an interdisciplinary research project titled “Linking Text-Processing Tools to Student Needs.” Their investigations focus on using writing as a language intervention context, as well as the effects of selected software features on students' writing skills.

3. Adelia M. Van Meter, MS, CCC-S, is an instructor, in the Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology at Western Michigan University. The authors are engaged in an interdisciplinary research project titled “Linking Text-Processing Tools to Student Needs.” Their investigations focus on using writing as a language intervention context, as well as the effects of selected software features on students' writing skills.

Abstract

This article describes a research study comparing the effects of two computer-based writing tools on the story-writing skills of fourth-through eighth-grade students with language-related learning disabilities. The first tool, the prompted writing feature of FrEdWriter (Rogers, 1985), allowed students to answer story grammar questions, then type stories using those responses as the plan; the second tool, Once Upon a Time (Urban, Rushing, & Star, 1990), allowed students to create graphic scenes, then type stories about those scenes. Nine students attended a series of afterschool writing labs twice weekly for 11 weeks, using each tool for half of the writing sessions. Group results did not clearly favor either tool; however, individual differences suggested that use of planning features should be linked to student needs. Students who had less internal organizational ability benefited from the computer-presented story grammar prompts and wrote less mature stories when using the graphics-based tool. Students with relatively strong organizational skills wrote more mature stories with the graphics-based tool.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Health Professions,Education,Health(social science)

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3