Learning Disabilities, Low Achievement, and Mild Mental Retardation

Author:

Gresham Frank M.1,MacMillan Donald L.2,Bocian Kathleen M.3

Affiliation:

1. Frank M. Gresham, PhD, is a professor and director of the school psychology program at the University of California, Riverside. His major research interests are social skills assessment of and training for children; behavioral consultation with teachers; and characteristics of children with emotional and behavioral disorders, learning disabilities, and mild mental retardation.

2. Donald L. MacMillan, EdD, is a professor of education at the University of California, Riverside. His research currently is focused on issues in classification of children with mild learning and behavioral problems, social and affective outcomes as indicative of educational treatments, and the development of self-concept.

3. Kathleen M. Bocian, PhD, is an educational specialist at the University of California, Riverside. She directs the research studies within the Research for Students At Risk Project. Address: Frank M. Gresham, School of Education, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521.

Abstract

Children identified with learning disabilities (LD), low achievement (LA), or mild mental retardation (MMR) were contrasted on 41 measures of ability, academic achievement, social skills, problem behavior, academic engaged time, perceptual-motor skills, and school history. Both multivariate, univariate, and meta-analytic comparisons among the three groups showed relatively large differences on measures of aptitude and achievement, with the LD group scoring higher on measures of cognitive ability than the LA and MMR groups and the LA group showing higher tested academic achievement than the LD and MMR groups. Teacher ratings of academic competence showed similar levels of functioning for the LD and LA groups. No differences among the groups were found on measures of social skills, problem behaviors, or academic engaged time, or on most indices reflecting school history. Results were interpreted in light of studies contrasting LD and LA groups. Comparisons with earlier studies were difficult in light of demographic differences in samples and the lower cognitive and academic functioning of children in the present study. The current study showed that 61% of the LD group could be differentiated from the LA group, with LD—MMR and LA—MMR differentiation levels being 68.51% and 67.5%, respectively.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Health Professions,Education,Health(social science)

Cited by 80 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3