Extensions of Multiple-Group Item Response Theory Alignment: Application to Psychiatric Phenotypes in an International Genomics Consortium

Author:

Mansolf Maxwell1ORCID,Vreeker Annabel2,Reise Steven P.1,Freimer Nelson B.1,Glahn David C.3,Gur Raquel E.4,Moore Tyler M.4,Pato Carlos N.5,Pato Michele T.5,Palotie Aarno678,Holm Minna9,Suvisaari Jaana9,Partonen Timo9,Kieseppä Tuula8,Paunio Tiina89,Boks Marco2,Kahn René10,Ophoff Roel A.1,Bearden Carrie E.1,Loohuis Loes Olde1,Teshiba Terri1,deGeorge Daniella1,Bilder Robert M.1, ,

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

4. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA

6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

7. Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

8. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

9. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland, Helsinki

10. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Large-scale studies spanning diverse project sites, populations, languages, and measurements are increasingly important to relate psychological to biological variables. National and international consortia already are collecting and executing mega-analyses on aggregated data from individuals, with different measures on each person. In this research, we show that Asparouhov and Muthén’s alignment method can be adapted to align data from disparate item sets and response formats. We argue that with these adaptations, the alignment method is well suited for combining data across multiple sites even when they use different measurement instruments. The approach is illustrated using data from the Whole Genome Sequencing in Psychiatric Disorders consortium and a real-data-based simulation is used to verify accurate parameter recovery. Factor alignment appears to increase precision of measurement and validity of scores with respect to external criteria. The resulting parameter estimates may further inform development of more effective and efficient methods to assess the same constructs in prospectively designed studies.

Funder

Stanley Foundation

National Institute of Mental Health

Simons Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3