Measurement bias in caregiver‐report of early childhood behavior problems across demographic factors in an ECHO‐wide diverse sample

Author:

Zheng Shuting1ORCID,Mansolf Maxwell2,McGrath Monica3,Churchill Marie L.3,Bekelman Traci A.4,Brennan Patricia A.5,Margolis Amy E.6,Nozadi Sara S.7,Bastain Theresa M.8,Elliott Amy J.9,LeWinn Kaja Z.1,Hofheimer Julie A.10,Leve Leslie D.11,Rennie Brandon12,Zimmerman Emily13,Marable Carmen A.14,McEvoy Cindy T.15,Liu Chang16,Sullivan Alexis17,Woodruff Tracey J.1,Ghosh Samiran18,Leventhal Bennett19,Ferrara Assiamira20,Lewis Johnnye21,Bishop Somer22,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California San Francisco CA USA

2. Department of Medical Social Sciences Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL USA

3. Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA

4. Department of Epidemiology Colorado School of Public Health Aurora CO USA

5. Department of Psychology Emory University Atlanta GA USA

6. Department of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York State Psychiatric Institute New York NY USA

7. Community Environmental Health College of Pharmacy Health Sciences Center University of New Mexico Albuquerque NM USA

8. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles CA USA

9. Avera Research Institute Sioux Falls SD USA

10. Department of Pediatrics Division of Neonatal‐Perinatal Medicine North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA

11. Prevention Science Institute University of Oregon Eugene OR USA

12. Health Sciences Center Department of Pediatrics Center for Development and Disability University of New Mexico Navajo Birth Cohort Study Albuquerque NM USA

13. Communication Sciences & Disorders Northeastern University Boston MA USA

14. School of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Neuroscience Curriculum Chapel Hill NC USA

15. Department of Pediatrics Pape Pediatric Research Institute Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR USA

16. Department of Psychology Washington State University Pullman WA USA

17. Center for Health and Community University of California San Francisco CA USA

18. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science & Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (CCCT) University of Texas School of Public Health Houston TX USA

19. University of Chicago Navajo Birth Cohort Study University of New Mexico Albuquerque NM USA

20. Division of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland CA USA

21. Navajo Birth Cohort Study Community Environmental Health Program College of Pharmacy University of New Mexico Albuquerque NM USA

22. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Weill Institute for Neurosciences University of California San Francisco CA USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundResearch and clinical practice rely heavily on caregiver‐report measures, such as the Child Behavior Checklist 1.5–5 (CBCL/1.5‐5), to gather information about early childhood behavior problems and to screen for child psychopathology. While studies have shown that demographic variables influence caregiver ratings of behavior problems, the extent to which the CBCL/1.5‐5 functions equivalently at the item level across diverse samples is unknown.MethodsItem‐level data of CBCL/1.5‐5 from a large sample of young children (N = 9087) were drawn from 26 cohorts in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes program. Factor analyses and the alignment method were applied to examine measurement invariance (MI) and differential item functioning (DIF) across child (age, sex, bilingual status, and neurodevelopmental disorders), and caregiver (sex, education level, household income level, depression, and language version administered) characteristics. Child race was examined in sensitivity analyses.ResultsItems with the most impactful DIF across child and caregiver groupings were identified for Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems. The robust item sets, excluding the high DIF items, showed good reliability and high correlation with the original Internalizing and Total Problems scales, with lower reliability for Externalizing. Language version of CBCL administration, education level and sex of the caregiver respondent showed the most significant impact on MI, followed by child age. Sensitivity analyses revealed that child race has a unique impact on DIF over and above socioeconomic status.ConclusionsThe CBCL/1.5‐5, a caregiver‐report measure of early childhood behavior problems, showed bias across demographic groups. Robust item sets with less DIF can measure Internalizing and Total Problems equally as well as the full item sets, with slightly lower reliability for Externalizing, and can be crosswalked to the metric of the full item set, enabling calculation of normed T scores based on more robust item sets.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3