Transforming the Paradigm for LGBTQ+ Evaluation: Advancing a Praxis of LGBTQ+ Inclusion and Liberation in Evaluation

Author:

Phillips Gregory1ORCID,Felt Dylan1,Perez-Bill Esrea1,Ruprecht Megan M.1,Glenn Erik Elías1,Lindeman Peter2,Miller Robin Lin3

Affiliation:

1. Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

2. Washtenaw County Department of Human Services, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA

3. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, Two-Spirit, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals encounter numerous obstacles to equity across health and healthcare, education, housing, employment, and other domains. Such barriers are even greater for LGBTQ+ individuals who are also Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), as well as those who are disabled, and those who are working-class, poor, and otherwise economically disadvantaged, among other intersecting forms of oppression. Given this, an evaluation cannot be equitable for LGBTQ+ people without meaningfully including our experiences and voices. Unfortunately, all evidence indicates that evaluation has systematically failed to recognize the presence and value of LGBTQ+ populations. Thus, we propose critical action steps and the articulation of a new paradigm of LGBTQ+ Evaluation. Our recommendations are grounded in transformative, equitable, culturally responsive, and decolonial frameworks, as well as our own experiences as LGBTQ+ evaluators and accomplices. We conclude by inviting others to participate in the articulation and enactment of this new paradigm.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Health (social science),Social Psychology,Business and International Management

Reference69 articles.

1. Colonialism and Science

2. American Evaluation Association. (2011). Statement On cultural competence In evaluation. https://www.eval.org/ccstatement

3. American Evaluation Association. (2018). Guiding principles For evaluators. https://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51

4. Bi Us, For Us: Articulating Foundational Principles for Research in Partnership with Bisexual Communities

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3