Affiliation:
1. Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
2. Washtenaw County Department of Human Services, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA
3. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, Two-Spirit, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals encounter numerous obstacles to equity across health and healthcare, education, housing, employment, and other domains. Such barriers are even greater for LGBTQ+ individuals who are also Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), as well as those who are disabled, and those who are working-class, poor, and otherwise economically disadvantaged, among other intersecting forms of oppression. Given this, an evaluation cannot be equitable for LGBTQ+ people without meaningfully including our experiences and voices. Unfortunately, all evidence indicates that evaluation has systematically failed to recognize the presence and value of LGBTQ+ populations. Thus, we propose critical action steps and the articulation of a new paradigm of LGBTQ+ Evaluation. Our recommendations are grounded in transformative, equitable, culturally responsive, and decolonial frameworks, as well as our own experiences as LGBTQ+ evaluators and accomplices. We conclude by inviting others to participate in the articulation and enactment of this new paradigm.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Health (social science),Social Psychology,Business and International Management
Reference69 articles.
1. Colonialism and Science
2. American Evaluation Association. (2011). Statement On cultural competence In evaluation. https://www.eval.org/ccstatement
3. American Evaluation Association. (2018). Guiding principles For evaluators. https://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51
4. Bi Us, For Us: Articulating Foundational Principles for Research in Partnership with Bisexual Communities
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献