Abstract
The LGBTQIA+ community is a strong, resilient, and diverse community that has been at the forefront of disrupting systems of oppression. However, research continues to stigmatize LGBTQIA+ people and exclude the community’s priorities. In response, many researchers, community advocates, and governmental organizations have called for the prioritization of inclusive, equity-centered research with LGBTQIA+ populations. Given the lack of “gold standards” that currently exist for such research, the purpose of this article is to digest and expand upon eight actionable priorities for engaging in equity-centered research with LGBTQIA+ populations: meaningful LGBTQIA+ data, safety, granularity, evolving identities, construct relevance, community-based research, intersectionality, and equity-centered research. By engaging in these practices, researchers can help dismantle systems of oppression that drive outcomes and opportunities for LGBTQIA+ populations, as well as shift narratives away from deficit-framing research and toward strength-based research. This article presents these considerations for researchers not as an exhaustive checklist, but rather as a resource for engaging in equity-centered research that meaningfully characterizes, protects, and celebrates the joy of LGBTQIA+ communities.
Funder
Research Triangle International
Reference54 articles.
1. Anderson, M. A., & Mastri, A. (2021). Culturally responsive and equitable evaluation for federal evaluation staff. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/culturally-responsive-and-equitable-evaluation-for-federal-evaluation-staff
2. Ashley, F. (2022). "Trans" is my gender modality: A modest terminological proposal. In Trans bodies, trans selves: A resource by and for transgender communities (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/trans-bodies-trans-selves-9780190092726?cc=us&lang=en&
3. Bauer, G. R., Churchill, S. M., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
4. Cahill, S., Grasso, C., Keuroghlian, A., Sciortino, C., & Mayer, K. (2020). Sexual and gender minority health in the COVID-19 pandemic: Why data collection and combatting discrimination matter now more than ever. American Journal of Public Health, 110(9), 1360-1361. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305829
5. Cahill, S., Singal, R., Grasso, C., King, D., Mayer, K., Baker, K., & Makadon, H. (2014). Do ask, do tell: High levels of acceptability by patients of routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data in four diverse American community health centers. PLoS One, 9(9), e107104. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107104