Institutional protocols for the oral administration (gavage) of chemicals and microscopic microbial communities to mice: Analytical consensus

Author:

Rodriguez-Palacios Alexander12ORCID,Khoretonenko Mikhail V3,Ilic Sanja4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, and Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

2. Digestive Diseases Mouse Models, Cleveland Digestive Diseases Reserch Core Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

3. Department of Biology, Lakeland Community College, Kirtland, OH 44094, USA

4. Department of Human Sciences and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Abstract

Although there are numerous Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols aimed at standardizing the oral administration (gavage) of liquid chemicals to laboratory rodents, there is ample variability across protocols, and there are no protocols intended for the gavage of microbial communities to mice or rats. The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review of publically available IACUC protocols from institutions in the United States, identify protocol criteria and deficiencies, and generate an ‘analytical consensus’ to unify such criteria into two revised protocols: one for chemicals, and another for microbes in mice. Eighteen (n = 18) written institutional protocols from prominent universities, and 26 demonstrations videos from various sources (accounting for >155,000 views) were identified in the World Wide Web. Although written protocols listed up to five criteria for consideration (dosing/volume, pregnancy, animal weight), collectively there was major variability and poor statistical agreement across methods (0% Kappa, p = 0.98). Because protocols also lacked details relevant for the bypassing and survival of live microorganisms in the gastric (antimicrobial) environment, we compiled two ‘analytical (Kappa-based) consensus’ protocols from available and new criteria, for the ‘gavage of chemicals’ and for the ‘gavage of delicate microscopic microbial communities’ to mice. A major difference lies in the volume of administration, (i.e., 20 mL/kg, without restrictions, after 4-6 h of fasting, for microbes), which was graphically illustrated simulating the predicted impact of administering large and small volumes on microbial distribution of simple microscopic communities. In conclusion, publicly available IACUC gavage protocols are highly variable, and do not reflect the need to adjust the dose volumes to ensure the rapid bypassing of the gastric environment which would impact the survival of microbes, especially if composing delicate microscopic communities. An ‘analytical consensus’ of IACUC-approved protocols is herein presented as a unifying baseline protocol for consideration. Impact statement Institutional protocols designed for the oral administration of live microbial communities, either complex or microscopic (microcosmic), to mice do not exist. However, this approach is increasingly employed by investigators focusing on the gut microbiome in experimental research. Herein, we propose two analytically Kappa-based consensus protocols to promote reproducibility and standardization in research practices and describe biologically relevant factors in achieving optimal microbial engraftment of communities in germ-free mice.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3