The impact of ignoring lags on developmental science: A re-analysis of meta-analyses using lag as moderator

Author:

Taylor Rachel M.1ORCID,Card Noel A.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Georgia, USA

Abstract

Longitudinal studies provide developmental science with invaluable information about how variables and the associations between variables change across time, but typically give limited attention to the length of time over which that change occurs. The present study re-analyzed data from previously published meta-analyses of longitudinal data across a broad range of developmental science to ascertain how lag may have impacted coefficients of stability ( kmeta-analyses = 6, kstudies = 157) and prediction ( kmeta-analyses = 15, kstudies = 270). We additionally analyzed how average participant age interacts with lag to test how the impact of lag might change across the lifespan. Findings indicate that conventional lags (e.g., 6 months, 12 months) were used at extremely high rates: More than 75% of lags were selected based on convention. Linear and nonlinear models indicated that lag moderated stability and predictive associations, although the significance, magnitude, and direction of this impact changed depending on the phenomenon under investigation. Average participant age interacted with lag in certain cases, providing a possibility for more time-specific developmental theory. However, these results should not be considered conclusive due to the high number of conventional lags in our sample, which likely restricted both variability in lags and the length of those lags. Future longitudinal studies should measure phenomena at varying lags, and future meta-analysts should consider both lag and average participant age when synthesizing longitudinal research. Both practices would enable developmental science to determine the interval over which a phenomenon occurs and facilitate advancements in developmental theory.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3