Affiliation:
1. School of Educational Policy and Leadership at The Ohio State University
2. Department of Educational Administration at Michigan State University
Abstract
Focusing on school leadership relations between principals and teachers, this study examines the potential of their active collaboration around instructional matters to enhance the quality of teaching and student performance. The analysis is grounded in two conceptions of leadership—transformational and instructional. The sample comprises 24 nationally selected restructured schools—8elementary, 8middle, and 8high schools. In keeping with the multilevel structure of the data, the primary analytic technique is hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The study finds that transformational leadership is a necessary but insufficient condition for instructional leadership. When transformational and shared instructional leadership coexist in an integrated form of leadership, the influence on school performance, measured by the quality of its pedagogy and the achievement of its students, is substantial.
Subject
Public Administration,Education
Reference33 articles.
1. Barth, R. (1986). On sheep and goats and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), 293-296.
2. A Description of Restructuring in Nationally Nominated Schools: Legacy of the Iron Cage?
3. Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1999). Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: Teacher perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 349-378.
4. Transforming the Frog into a Prince: Effective Schools Research, Policy, and Practice at the District Level
5. Donmoyer, R. & Wagstaff, J. G. (1990). Principals can be effective managers and instructional leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 74(525), 20-29.
Cited by
764 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献