“It made me feel like it was okay to be wrong”: Student experiences with ungrading

Author:

Gorichanaz Tim1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Drexel University, USA

Abstract

This paper presents an interpretative phenomenological analysis study of students’ experiences with ungrading in the form of reflection-based self-evaluation in a college course. In the landscape of student evaluation, ungrading strategies respond to the limitations of traditional grading systems, particularly with respect to cultivating in-demand skills and capacities, such as adaptability, creative thinking, and self-management. Through in-depth interviews with eight students, this study reports on four experiential themes that characterize the switch to ungrading: de-gamification, or unsettling the “gamified” nature of evaluation in the traditional grading system; time to think and reflect, creating space for review and the deepening of learning; rich communication, or continual feedback between teacher and student; and learning community, in which students felt like they were part of a team effort rather than siloed individuals. Considerations for further research, as well as implementation of ungrading in other courses, are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference52 articles.

1. American Institute of Stress (2019) Stress: An epidemic among college students. Available at: https://www.stress.org/stress-an-epidemic-among-college-students (accessed 14 April 2022).

2. More than just a variable: COVID-19 and the call to complicate communication education research

3. Aslanian S, Roth A (2021) Under pressure: Inside the college mental health crisis. APM Reports, 19 August. Available at: https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2021/08/19/under-pressure-the-college-mental-health-crisis (accessed 14 April 2022).

4. The Relations of Learning and Grade Orientations to Academic Performance

5. A Change to Pass/Fail Grading in the First Two Years at One Medical School Results in Improved Psychological Well-Being

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3