Affiliation:
1. The University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA
Abstract
There is evidence that data-based decision-making (DBDM) can improve outcomes for a wide range of students. However, less is known about how special education teachers are trained to use data to inform instruction that targets academic progress for students with extensive support needs (ESN). The purpose of this systematic literature review was to describe the intervention literature on the impact of professional development (PD) on teachers’ use of DBDM for students with ESN. Eight studies were identified. The DBDM interventions primarily targeted teachers’ decision-making related to instruction in individualized curricular goals or academics in functional contexts and were driven by data on isolated skills and concrete decision rules. All but one study documented some improvement in teacher or student outcomes after DBDM PD. Suggestions for future research, limitations of this review, and implications for practice—including student progress in the general education curriculum—are discussed.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference70 articles.
1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.
2. Why Aren’t Students with Severe Disabilities Being Placed in General Education Classrooms: Examining the Relations Among Classroom Placement, Learner Outcomes, and Other Factors
3. Promoting Access through Segregation: The Emergence of the “Prioritized Curriculum” Class
4. *Bolton M. (2014). The effects of progress monitoring in the area of literacy for students with significant cognitive delays [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Missouri Baptist University.
5. Brookhart S., Lazarus S. (2017). Formative assessment for students with disabilities. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/Formative_Assessment_for_Students_with_Disabilities.pdf
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献