Affiliation:
1. Karrie A. Shogren, Tyler A. Hicks, and Jennifer A. Kurth, University of Kansas, Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities
Abstract
Abstract
Students with complex support needs have intense and frequent support needs for learning and participating across multiple domains. Addressing those needs in a comprehensive manner is the purpose of special education, which is accomplished through instructional and Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals. Yet simply setting goals is insufficient; to facilitate positive student outcomes, there is an inherent expectation that students will meet those goals to achieve their potential. Understanding factors that impact variability in goal attainment is essential to this purpose. This includes the extent to which variability in goal attainment is explained by factors varying within students (e.g., goal domains being targeted) or by factors varying between students (e.g., education placement, overall intensity of student support needs). Using Bayesian multi-level modeling analysis to examine the instructional goals of 53 elementary students with complex support needs, we found that 75% of variability in goal attainment exists within student’s goals. However, 25% of variability is explained by factors that vary across students—in this case, educational placement and overall intensity of support needs. We conclude with recommendations for research and practice aimed at enhancing goal attainment for students with complex support needs.
Publisher
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
Reference41 articles.
1. Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors;Agran,;Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,(2020)
2. Being in the right place at the right time: Educational placement of students with intellectual disability by state and year;Anderson,;Inclusion,(2020)
3. Bayesian predictive information criterion for the evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian and empirical Bayes models;Ando,;Biometrika,(2007)
4. Teacher-reported priorities and practices for students with autism: Characterizing the research-to-practice gap;Brock,;Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,(2020)
5. From plot twists, progress, and the persistence of segregated education: The continuing struggle for inclusive education in relation to students with intellectual disabilities;Buchner,;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,(2021)