Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for Automatic Coronary Stenosis Detection in X-ray Angiography
Author:
Danilov Viacheslav1ORCID, Gerget Olga2ORCID, Klyshnikov Kirill3ORCID, Ovcharenko Evgeny3ORCID, Frangi Alejandro4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Tomsk Polytechnic University, University of Leeds 2. Tomsk Polytechnic University 3. Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases 4. University of Leeds
Abstract
The article explores the application of machine learning approach to detect both single-vessel and multivessel coronary artery disease from X-ray angiography. Since the interpretation of coronary angiography images requires interventional cardiologists to have considerable training, our study is aimed at analysing, training, and assessing the potential of the existing object detectors for classifying and detecting coronary artery stenosis using angiographic imaging series. 100 patients who underwent coronary angiography at the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases were retrospectively enrolled in the study. To automate the medical data analysis, we examined and compared three models (SSD MobileNet V1, Faster-RCNN ResNet-50 V1, FasterRCNN NASNet) with various architecture, network complexity, and a number of weights. To compare developed deep learning models, we used the mean Average Precision (mAP) metric, training time, and inference time. Testing results show that the training/inference time is directly proportional to the model complexity. Thus, Faster-RCNN NASNet demonstrates the slowest inference time. Its mean inference time per one image made up 880 ms. In terms of accuracy, FasterRCNN ResNet-50 V1 demonstrates the highest prediction accuracy. This model has reached the mAP metric of 0.92 on the validation dataset. SSD MobileNet V1 has demonstrated the best inference time with the inference rate of 23 frames per second.
Publisher
MONOMAX Limited Liability Company
Reference19 articles.
1. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators: Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a system atic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (London, England) 392(10159), 1736–1788 (nov 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7 2. Antczak, K., Liberadzki, Ł.: Stenosis Detection with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. MATEC Web of Conferences 210, 04001 (oct 2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821004001 3. Chi, Y., Huang, W., Zhou, J., Toe, K.K., Zhang, J.M., Wong, P., Lim, S., Tan, R.S., Zhong, L.: Stenosis detection and quantification on cardiac CTCA using panoramic MIP of coronary arteries. In: 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). pp. 4191–4194. IEEE (jul 2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037780 4. Kang, D., Dey, D., Slomka, P.J., Arsanjani, R., Nakazato, R., Ko, H., Berman, D.S., Li, D., Kuo, C.C.J.: Structured learning algorithm for detection of nonobstructive and obstructive coronary plaque lesions from computed tomography angiography. Journal of Medical Imaging 2(1), 014003 (mar 2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.2.1.014003 5. Kang, D., Slomka, P.J., Nakazato, R., Arsanjani, R., Cheng, V.Y., Min, J.K., Li, D., Berman, D.S., Jay Kuo, C.C., Dey, D.: Automated knowledge-based detection of nonobstructive and obstructive arterial lesions from coronary CT angiography. Medical Physics 40(4), 041912 (apr 2013). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4794480
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|