New Dawn or Bad Moon Rising?

Author:

Godard John1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Abstract

This article discusses the potential advantages of large scale, government administered workplace surveys and the limitations of these surveys in the past. It then reviews the 1995 AWIRS (Australia), the 1998 WERS (U.K.), and the 1999 WES (Canada) in accordance with how well they appear to have succeeded in overcoming these limitations, and, more generally, with their implications for the conduct of industrial relations (IR) research. It is argued that the 1995 AWIRS does not appreciably overcome the limitations of previous surveys. In contrast, the 1998 WERS has yielded a substantially higher quality data set, although it also does not completely overcome the limitations of its predecessors. Finally, the 1999 WES promises an even higher quality data set, but is primarily a labour market and productivity survey rather than an IR survey, and could even portend a “bad moon rising” for Canadian IR research.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference38 articles.

1. Callus, R., A. Morehead, M. Cully, and J. Buchanan. 1991. Industrial Relations at Work: The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey. Canberra: ACPS.

2. Cully, Mark. 1998. “Guvnors, Employees, and Brothers: Triangulation and Noise in Workplace Surveys.” Paper presented to the U.S. Bureau of Census International Symposium on Linked Employer-Employee Data, Arlington, Virginia, May 21–22.

3. Cully, Mark, and Paul Marginson. 1995. “The Workplace Industrial Relations Surveys: Donovan and the Burden of Continuity.” Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 55. Warwick, U.K.: Industrial Relations Unit, Warwick University.

4. Cully, Mark, Stephen Woodland, Andrew O’Reilly, and Gill Dix. 1999. Britain at Work. London: Routledge.

5. Delaney, John, and John Godard. 2001 (forthcoming). “An IR Perspective on the High Performance Paradigm.” Human Resource Management Review.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3