Affiliation:
1. Memorial University of Newfoundland
Abstract
This paper identifies and considers issues of perspective taking and communicative agency in applying Jürgen Habermas’s discourse theory to policymaking in educational settings. The central question is whether Habermas provides an epistemic framework that supports reciprocal and sincere expressions of the views and interests of individuals in a heterogeneous society. Examining this question leads to a discussion of “practical discourse” in light of a willingness of participants to reach mutual understanding and agreement, and the centrality of perspective taking and communicative agency in such discourses. Also examined is a conceptualization of “application discourses,” the implications of such discourses for perspective taking and communicative agency, and the role these discourses might play in further assuring the overall inclusivity and context sensitivity of applying education policies in specific circumstances. The paper then gives a brief re-analysis of an empirical study that used Habermas’s concept of the “ideal speech situation” as a normative framework for interpreting data. The re-analysis means to illustrate the practical value of practical discourse for guiding and assessing educational policymaking. The paper ends with a short justification of the necessity of attending to perspective taking and communicative agency when viewing education as a basic human right.
Reference38 articles.
1. Barry, K. B. (2022). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/a77324-early-childhood-care-and-education
2. Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2010). A researcher-student-teacher model for democratic science pedagogy: Connections to community, shared authority, and critical science agency. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(1), 72–87.
3. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.
4. Brown, R. (2009). Teaching for social justice: Exploring the development of student agency through participation in the literacy of a mathematics classroom. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 12(3), 171–185.
5. Clark, S. N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rose, C. P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 10, 27–39.