Abstract
In this paper, Critical Realism is used as a theoretical framework to show that diversity is an asset to science not a threat. Critical Realism situates the reliability and reproducibility of science in the realm of the real and thus relocates the notion of “objectivity” from the person of the scientist to the process of science. This means that it no longer necessary to attempt to minimise the person of the scientist in pursuit of rigorous knowledge. The implication is that diversity both in terms of intellectual training (within limits) and in terms of being multicultural, gender, sexuality, multilingual, is revealed to be an asset. This is because the construction of knowledge draws on personal experience and having people with divergent experience interrogating the same problem is more likely to provide a reliable, reproducible solution. In the latter parts of the paper, the implications for teaching are described. In addition, it is demonstrated that this argument can be extended into different knowledge areas.
Reference41 articles.
1. Decolonising the science curriculum: When good intentions are not enough;H. Adendorff,2020
2. Decolonisation and science education I: What is at stake?;H. Adendorff,2022
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Indigenous knowledge systems and science education;South African Journal of Science;2024-05-28
2. Embodiment Matters in Knowledge Building;Science & Education;2024-02-17
3. A practice-based guide for creating STEM service learning courses;Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement;2023-12-21
4. Science and language, knowledge and power;South African Journal of Science;2023-11-29