Embodiment Matters in Knowledge Building

Author:

Blackie MargaretORCID,Luckett KathyORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we begin a conversation with educators invested in developing epistemic insight. We argue that generative artificial intelligence provides an opportunity to make a necessary corrective to our understanding of knowledge and knowledge building. The use of the metaphors of such as ‘human-as-machine’ has inadvertently promoted a reductive understanding of knowledge which has led to an impoverished version of higher education. In reducing the person to an information processor, knowledge has been artificially separated from the knower. The view of the human person as a relational being situated in time and space along with a recognition that intuition and imagination are important dimensions of knowledge development point to the significance of the embodiment of knowledge. For knowledge to have value and meaning, it must be enacted by a particular, embodied person. The recognition of the importance of embodiment and the associated implications are crucial if higher education is to respond in a meaningful way to the challenge presented by generative AI.

Funder

Rhodes University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. Adendorff, H., & Blackie, M. (2020). Decolonising the science curriculum: when good intentions are not enough. In C. Winburg, K. Wilmot, & S. Mckenna (Eds.), Building knowledge in higher education: Enhancing teaching and learning with LCT. Routledge.

2. Apple, M. (1976). Curriculum an ideological selection. Comparative Education Review, 20(2), 209–215.

3. Ashwin, P. (2020). Transforming university education: A manifesto. Bloomsbury Publishing.

4. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique (Vol. 5). Rowman & Littlefield

5. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Hassocks England: Harvester Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Breaking Free from Laplace’s Chains;Science & Education;2024-05-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3