Author:
Sylvia Sean,Yi Hongmei,Xue Hao,Liu Gordon
Abstract
AbstractA key feature of public sector employment in many countries is rigid civil service rules that effectively limit manager autonomy over hiring, firing, promotion, and compensation decisions. We study the effect of these rules by comparing the quality of healthcare provided by physicians employed as civil servants with physicians hired in the same facilities on fixed-term contracts that give managers more autonomy over personnel decisions. Using data from interactions with unannounced standardized patients, we find that fixed-term contracts motivate greater diagnostic effort without increasing unnecessary treatments. Lower effort among civil servants appears due to both weaker career and wage incentives.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference84 articles.
1. Counting Cadres: A Comparative View of the Size of China's Public Employment
2. Nava Ashraf , Oriana Bandiera , Edward Davenport , and Scott S Lee . Losing Prosociality in the Quest for Talent? Sorting, Selection, and Productivity in the Delivery of Public Services. American Economic Review, page 44, 2019.
3. Paul Atherton and Geeta Kingdon . The relative effectiveness and costs of contract and regular teachers in India. Technical report, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, 2010.
4. China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme Improved Finances Of Township Health Centers But Not The Number Of Patients Served
5. Eduardo Banzon and Mathilde Mailfert . Overcoming Public Sector Inefficiencies toward Universal Health Coverage: The Case for National Health Insurance Systems in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank, May 2018. doi: http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/10.22617/WPS189361-2.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献