Abstract
AbstractBackgroundHealth information systems are important for health planning and monitoring of progress. Still, data from health facilities are often of limited quality in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries. Quality deficits are partially rooted in the fact that paper-based documentation is still the norm at facility level, leading to mistakes in summarizing and manual copying. Digitalization of data at facility level would allow automatization of these procedural steps. Here we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a scanning innovation called Smart Paper Technology for digital data processing.MethodsWe used a mixed-methods design to understand users’ engagement with Smart Paper Technology and to identify potential positive and negative effects of this innovation in three health facilities in Southern Tanzania. Eight focus group discussions and 11 in-depth interviews with users were conducted. We quantified time used by health care providers for documentation and patient care using time-motion methods. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear models were generated to compare the difference before and after introduction and adjust for confounders.ResultsHealth care providers and health care managers appreciated the forms’ simple design features and perceived Smart Paper Technology as time-saving and easy to use. The time-motion study with 273.3 and 224.0 hours of observations before and after introduction of Smart Paper Technology, respectively, confirmed that working time spent on documentation did not increase (27.0% at baseline and 26.4% post-introduction; adjusted p=0.763). Time spent on patient care was not negatively impacted (26.9% at baseline and 37.1% at post-intervention; adjusted p=0.001). Health care providers described positive effects on their accountability for data and service provision relating to the fact that individually signed forms were filled.DiscussionHealth care providers perceived Smart Paper Technology as feasible, easy to integrate and acceptable in their setting, particularly as it did not add time to documentation.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference42 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva: 2007 Contract No.: ISBN 978 92 4 159607 7
2. Health information systems: the foundations of public health;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2005
3. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals New York 2015 [ May 2020]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics.
4. Using health-facility data to assess subnational coverage of maternal and child health indicators, Kenya
5. University of Oslo. DHIS2 in action [cited 2021 13.05.]. Available from: https://dhis2.org/in-action/.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献