Understanding maternity care providers’ use of data in Southern Tanzania

Author:

Unkels RegineORCID,Alwy Al-Beity FadhlunORCID,Julius Zamoyoni,Mkumbo Elibariki,Pembe Andrea B,Hanson ClaudiaORCID,Molsted-Alvesson Helle

Abstract

IntroductionHealth information management system data is collected for national planning and evaluation but is rarely used for healthcare improvements at subnational or facility-level in low-and-middle-income countries. Research suggests that perceived data quality and lack of feedback are contributing factors. We aimed to understand maternity care providers’ perceptions of data and how they use it, with a view to co-design interventions to improve data quality and use.MethodsWe based our research on constructivist grounded theory. We conducted 14 in-depth interviews, two focus group discussions with maternity care providers and 48 hours of observations in maternity wards to understand maternity providers’ interaction with data in two rural hospitals in Southern Tanzania. Constant comparative data analysis was applied to develop initial and focused codes, subcategories and categories were continuously validated through peer and member checks.ResultsMaternity care providers found routine health information data of little use to reconcile demands from managers, the community and their challenging working environment within their daily work. They thus added informal narrative documentation sources. They created alternative narratives through data of a maternity care where mothers and babies were safeguarded. The resulting documentation system, however, led to duplication and increased systemic complexity.ConclusionsCurrent health information systems may not meet all data demands of maternity care providers, or other healthcare workers. Policy makers and health information system specialists need to acknowledge different ways of data use beyond health service planning, with an emphasis on healthcare providers’ data needs for clinical documentation.

Funder

Karolinska Institute

European Commission

European Union

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference56 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Contract No.: ISBN 978 92 4 159607 7. Geneva; 2007.

2. Health information systems: the foundations of public health;AbouZahr;Bull World Health Organ,2005

3. Kumalija C . Update of M&E Strengthening Initiatives (M&E SI) A Tanzanian Platform for Health Information and Accountability Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2017.

4. Unkels R , Manzi F , Kapologwe NA . Feasibility, usability and acceptability of a novel digital hybrid-system for reporting of routine health information in Southern Tanzania a mixed-methods study. medRxiv 2022.doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.22270225

5. Policy, paperwork and 'postographs': Global indicators and maternity care documentation in rural Burkina Faso;Melberg;Soc Sci Med,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3