Understanding maternity care providers’ use of data: A qualitative study in Southern Tanzania

Author:

Unkels Regine,Al-beity Fadhlun Alwy,Julius Zamoyoni,Mkumbo Elibariki,Pembe Andrea B,Hanson ClaudiaORCID,Mölsted-Alvesson Helle

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionHealth information management system data is collected for national planning and evaluation but rarely used for health care improvements at the sub-national or facility-level in low-and-middle-income countries. Research suggests that perceived data quality and lack of feedback are contributing factors. We aimed to understand maternity care providers’ perceptions of data and how they use them, with a view to co-design interventions to improve data quality and use.MethodsWe based our research on constructivist grounded theory. We conducted 14 in-depth interviews, two focus group discussions with maternity care providers and 48 hours of observations in maternity wards of two rural hospitals in Southern Tanzania. Constant comparative data analysis was applied to develop initial and focused codes, sub-categories and categories continuously validated through peer and member checks.ResultsMaternity care providers appropriated numeric data on service provision to reconcile their professional values and demands from managers and the community with effects of a challenging working environment. They felt controlled by their managers’ data requirements and alienated from service provision data. Providers added informal documentation ways for their own narrative data needs to reflect on and improve service quality. These also assisted them to recreate social relationships with managers, clients and the community. The resulting documentation system led to duplication and increased systemic complexity.ConclusionsData from health information systems does not represent an independent and neutral entity but is embedded into the social realities of different users. Appropriation and use of data reflect these realities and users’ working environment. Interventions to improve data quality and use may need to incorporate the multitude of clinical and administrative documentation and data needs to avoid duplication and inefficiencies.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference53 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva; 2007. Contract No.: ISBN 978 92 4 159607 7

2. Health information systems: the foundations of public health;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2005

3. Kumalija C. Update of M&E Strengthening Initiatives (M&E SI) A Tanzanian Platform for Health Information and Accountability Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 2017.

4. Unkels R , Manzi F , Kapologwe NA , Baker U , Ahmad A , Nabiev R , et al. Feasibility, usability and acceptability of a novel digital hybrid-system for reporting of routine health information in Southern Tanzania A mixed-methods study. medRxiv. 2022:2022.02.07.22270225.

5. Policy, paperwork and ‘postographs’: Global indicators and maternity care documentation in rural Burkina Faso;Soc Sci Med,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3