The effect of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection and relation with serological response – a prospective cohort study

Author:

de Gier BrechjeORCID,Huiberts Anne J.,Hoeve Christina E.,Hartog Gerco denORCID,van Werkhoven Henri,van Binnendijk Rob,Hahné Susan J.M.,de Melker Hester E.,van den Hof Susan,Knol Mirjam J.

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo estimate the protective effect of previous infections and vaccinations on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection.DesignProspective cohort studySettingCommunity-based cohort, the NetherlandsParticipants43,257 Community-dwelling adults aged 18-85 years contributed 8,291,966 person-days between 10 January 2022 and 1 September 2022.Main outcome measuresSARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as either a reported positive (self-administered) antigen or PCR test, or seroconversion or 4-fold increase in Nucleoprotein-antibodies, based on 6-monthly serum samples. Cox proportional hazard models were used with SARS-CoV-2 infection and any COVID-19 vaccination as time-varying exposures, calendar time as underlying time scale and adjustment for age, sex, medical risk and educational level.ResultsIn participants with 2, 3 or 4 prior immunizing events (vaccination or previous infection), we found a relative reduction of 71-85% in Omicron infection in weeks 4-10 post-last event with hybrid immunity compared to vaccine-induced immunity. Differences in risk of infection were partly explained by differences in anti-Spike RBD (S) antibody concentration, which showed a similar pattern but with smaller differences between vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity. Compared to the lowest quartile, participants in subsequent quartiles of S-antibody concentrations had 19%, 35% and 71% reduced risk of infection, respectively. Among participants with hybrid immunity, with one previous pre-Omicron infection, there was no relevant difference in risk of Omicron infection by sequence of vaccination(s) and infection. Regardless of the type of previous immunizing events, additional events increased the protection against infection, but not above the level of the first weeks after the previous event.ConclusionsOur results showed that hybrid immunity is more protective against infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron than vaccine-induced immunity, up to at least 30 weeks after the last immunizing event. Among those with hybrid immunity, the sequence and number of immunizing events was not found to be of importance, and its protective effect was partly explained by circulating S-antibodies. In our population with a high level of immunity, additional immunizing events reduced risk of infection with Omicron variants only temporarily.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register (NTR), registration number NL9279 (available viaICTRP Search Portal (who.int))What is already known on this topicStudies have found that a previous infection combined with vaccination (hybrid immunity) lowers the risk of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection compared to vaccination alone. These studies are mainly test-negative case-control studies, and may be influenced by the increasing use of self-administered antigen testing, and by untested infections. The importance of the sequence and number of immunizing events in hybrid immunity against Omicron infection, and its association with circulating antibody concentrations, is largely unknown.What this study addsHybrid immunity confers better protection against Omicron infection compared to vaccine-induced immunity, up to at least 30 weeks post-immunizing event, regardless of the sequence or number of immunizing events.The patterns in protection of hybrid immunity against Omicron infection are partly explained by patterns in S-antibody concentration, which was associated with risk of infection in a dose-reponse manner.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference20 articles.

1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) the Netherlands. Variants of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. 2022 [cited 2022 27 November]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/en/coronavirus-covid-19/virus/variants.

2. Pluijmaekers AJM , de Melker HE . The National Immunisation Programme in the Netherlands. Surveillance and developments in 2021-2022.: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2022. RIVM Report 2022-0042.

3. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) the Netherlands. Vaccination figures: 22 to 28 August 2022 2022 [cited 2022 27 November]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/en/covid-19-vaccination/archive-covid-19-vaccination-figures-2022n.

4. Bobrovitz N , Ware H , Ma X , Li Z , Hosseini R , Cao C , Selemon A , Whelan M , Premji Z , Issa H , Cheng B ,. Abu Raddad LJ , Buckeridge D , Van Kerkhove M , Piechotta V , Higdon M , Wilder-Smith A , Bergeri I , Feikin D , Arora RK , Patel M , Subissi L. . Protective effectiveness of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against Omicron infection and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression.(preprint). medRxiv. 2022;2022.10.02.22280610.

5. Huiberts A KM , De Melker H , Hahné S , Grobbee D , Hoeve C , Van Binnendijk R , Den Hartog G , Van de Wijgert J , Van den Hof S , Knol, M. Design and baseline description of an observational population-based cohort study on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in the Netherlands - The VAccine Study COvid-19 (VASCO). (preprint) 2022. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360721847_Design_and_baseline_description_of_an_observational_population-based_cohort_study_on_COVID-19_vaccine_effectiveness_in_the_Netherlands_-_The_VAccine_Study_COvid-19_VASCO

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3