Affiliation:
1. National University of Singapore
Abstract
Abstract
When is it permissible to rely on a proposition in practical reasoning? Standard answers to this question face serious challenges. This paper uses these challenges to motivate a certainty norm of practical reasoning. This norm holds that one is permitted to rely on p in practical reasoning if and only if p is epistemically certain. After developing and defending this norm, I consider its broader implications. Taking a certainty norm seriously calls into question traditional assumptions about the importance of belief and knowledge. In particular, it raises the possibility that many epistemological jobs that are usually assigned to belief and knowledge should be reallocated to two related but importantly different states: psychological and epistemic certainty.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference62 articles.
1. Knowledge, Practical Adequacy, and Stakes;Anderson,2019
2. Does Knowledge Entail Belief?;Armstrong;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,1969
3. New Work for Certainty;Beddor;Philosophers’ Imprint
4. Believing Epistemic Contradictions;Beddor;The Review of Symbolic Logic,2018
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How to act on what you know;Synthese;2024-06-04
2. Trust and Trustworthiness;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
3. Therapeutic Trust;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
4. Trust, Vulnerability, and Monitoring;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
5. Trust, Risk, and Negligence;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23