Affiliation:
1. University of Glasgow , UK
Abstract
Abstract
We’ve up to this point seen what convictively apt trust demands (Chapter 5); this chapter explores what it permits. Our guiding question is: What kind of risks to the first-order aptness of trust can the convictively apt trustor non-negligently ignore? An answer inspired by Ernest Sosa’s answer to a generalized version of this question is canvassed and criticized, and a different answer—one that gives de minimis risk a central place—is developed and defended.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference359 articles.
1. Testimony, Trust, Knowing;Adler;The Journal of Philosophy,1994
2. The Ethics of Belief: Off the Wrong Track;Adler;Midwest Studies in Philosophy,1999
3. Epistemic Paternalism
4. COVID-19 and the 5g Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data;Ahmed;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2020
5. The Topology of Communities of Trust;Alfano;Russian Sociological Review,2016