Assessment of Regulatory Compliance Testing for Vitamin D in Infant Formula—Impact of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/828

Author:

Gilliland Donald L1ORCID,Gill Brendon D2ORCID,Kissling Roger C2ORCID,Starkey Dustin E1ORCID,Indyk Harvey E2ORCID,McMahon Adrienne3ORCID,Broek Arnold P4ORCID,van Gool Martine P4ORCID,Cruijsen Hans M M4ORCID,Konings Erik J M5ORCID,Campos-Gimenez Esther6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Abbott Nutrition , 3300 Stelzer Rd. , Columbus, OH 43016, USA

2. Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited , P.O. Box 7 , Waitoa 3380, New Zealand

3. Wyeth Nutritionals , Askeaton, Co. Limerick, Ireland

4. FrieslandCampina , Amersfoort, The Netherlands

5. Nestlé Institute of Food Safety and Analytical Sciences, EPFL Innovation Park , Bâtiment H, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

6. Nestlé Institute of Food Safety and Analytical Sciences , Route du Jorat 57 , Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background Since the publication of Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPR®) for vitamin D in infant formula (SMPR 2011.004) by AOAC INTERNATIONAL, revised vitamin D limits have been recommended by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for infant formula and adopted in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/828. The vitamin D range introduced, 2–2.5 μg/100 kcal, is significantly narrower than previous limits specified by Codex Standard 72–1981 and requires lower method reproducibility metrics to adequately assess regulatory compliance. The narrower limits for vitamin D present a significant challenge for current-generation reference analytical methods that comply with SMPR 2011.004. Objective We evaluate the impact of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/828 on the demonstrated performance of AOAC Method 2016.05/ISO 20636:2018 to assess the likelihood that vitamin D results produced by the method would be found outside the EU limits when testing infant formula that is compliant as manufactured. Methods AOAC Method 2016.05/ISO 20636:2018, specifically data generated during multi-laboratory study, was used as a basis for statistical evaluation of the impact of the narrower EU vitamin D limits. Results The review of AOAC Method 2016.05/ISO 20636:2018 method performance against the vitamin D regulatory range introduced in (EU) 2019/828 indicates methods capable of performing in alignment with SMPR 2011.004 are likely to produce results that fail to meet EU requirements. Conclusions Our assessment illustrates the high probability that a well-manufactured product with vitamin D levels within the EU regulatory range would fail to meet the regulatory requirements due to analytical method variability when tested using fit-for-purpose methods. Further, required method performance cannot be expected with the future development of new methods. To avoid this, consideration should be given to aligning proposed regulatory limits with method performance metrics of current-generation compendial methods. Highlights Current, state-of-the-art methods cannot consistently verify infant formula product compliance for vitamin D in accordance with (EU) 2019/828.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology,Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Chemistry,Food Science,Analytical Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3