Abstract
Abstract
Many countries are proposing major public infrastructure investment, addressing the net zero imperative and need to recover from the pandemic. Yet the investments will deliver on these policy goals only if appraisals take account of strategic complementarities in determining the future path of the economy, including technological choices. Cost–benefit analysis as currently applied is unable to do this, even when incorporating wider economic benefits. Furthermore, in purporting to be a technical tool, it fails to acknowledge the inevitable political judgements and distributional consequences involved in selecting projects. There is a need for an approach to appraisal that identifies when major projects have transformational potential, and an approach to policy that ensures complementary investments occur, by tackling coordination failures either among different policy actors or between private- and public-sector activities.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference60 articles.
1. ‘Public Infrastructure And Growth: New Channels and Policy Implications’,;Agénor,2006
2. ‘Did Railroads Induce or Follow Economic Growth? Urbanization and Population Growth in the American Midwest, 1850–1860’;Atack;Social Science History,2010
3. ‘The Impact of Mobile Technology on Economic Growth: Global Insights from 2000–2017 Developments’,;Bahia,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献