Abstract
Abstract
Major projects are high-value (£100 million+) investments across sectors such as transport, energy, health, defence, or IT systems. Globally, a significant proportion of government policy initiatives are delivered through major projects. There is, however, a paradox at the heart of the major project phenomenon. Although major projects are indispensable tools for turning policy ideals into reality, their track record is strikingly poor. Cost and time overruns, financial engineering, under-supply, poor service, environmental detriment, and social dissatisfaction blight major projects. Poor outcomes have been a feature of the wide array of delivery mechanisms deployed over the past 150 years, including direct public provision, regulated private provision, public–private partnerships, and concessions, agreements, and franchises. The papers in this issue of the Oxford Review of Economic Policy explore the nature of this paradox and offer strategies designed to get major projects right, including repeatable platform strategies; mission-orientated investments; and deliberative and collaborative incentive schemes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference18 articles.
1. ‘How Can South Africa Advance a New Energy Paradigm? A Mission-oriented Approach to Megaprojects’;Andreoni;Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2022
2. ‘Location Decisions of Large Firms: Analyzing the Procurement of Infrastructure Services’,;Ansar;Journal of Economic Geography,2012
3. ‘How to Solve Big Problems: Bespoke versus Platform Strategies’;Flyvbjerg;Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2022
4. ‘Should We Build More Dams? The Actual Costs of Mega-Dam Development’;Budzier;Energy Policy,2014
5. ‘Does Infrastructure Investment Lead to Economic Growth or Economic Fragility? Evidence from China’,;Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2016
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献